Tags
Tag: "philosophy of science"
The Return of the Design Argument
Taner Edis reviews two books about evolution and design.
[Issue 50: March/April 2005: Books]
Wittgenstein Solves (Posthumously) the Species Problem
Our science columnist Massimo Pigliucci on a longstanding problem in biology and how philosophy helps.
[Issue 50: March/April 2005: Science]
John Herschel
Toni Vogel Carey on a memorable but forgotten scientist and philosopher.
[Issue 48: October/November 2004: Articles]
Can An Evolutionist Believe in God?
Steve Stewart-Williams says not.
[Issue 47: August/September 2004: Philosophy of Religion]
Newton’s Flaming Laser Sword
Mike Alder explains why mathematicians and scientists don’t like philosophy but do it anyway.
[Issue 46: May/June 2004: Articles]
The Alleged Fallacies of Evolutionary Theory
In Issue 44, Peter Williams claimed to have found numerous logical fallacies in the writings of Richard Dawkins. His article has provoked this blow-by-blow response from Massimo Pigliucci, Joshua Banta, Christen Bossu, Paula Crouse, Troy Dexter, Kerry Hansknecht and Norris Muth.
[Issue 46: May/June 2004: Science]
After the Science Wars
Abdelkader Aoudjit reports on which beleaguered positions are still held After the Science Wars.
[Issue 45: March/April 2004: Books]
Bohr & Kant & Zeno
Would it not be nice if there were a simple foundation to quantum physics? Tony Wagstaff believes there is; and that the Greeks had it.
[Issue 45: March/April 2004: Articles]
Carbon Copies
Neill Furr examines the various arguments against human cloning and finds them all flawed. He says we should proceed with caution, but doesn’t think cloning should be banned.
[Issue 44: January/February 2004: The Issues]
Did the World Have a Beginning?
Mark Goldblatt on a medieval debate with modern echoes.
[Issue 44: January/February 2004: Articles]
Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ... | 14 | Next |