×
welcome covers

Your complimentary articles

You’ve read all of your complimentary articles for this month. To have complete access to the thousands of philosophy articles on this site, please


If you are a subscriber please sign in to your account.

To buy or renew a subscription please visit the Shop.

If you are a print subscriber you can contact us to create an online account.

Articles

Sick to Death?

Is suicide a disease to be treated, or a choice to be respected? Justin Busch tackles the problem by analysing the concept of disease.

To be, or not to be: that is the question:
Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
And by opposing end them? To die: to sleep;
No more; and by a sleep to say we end
The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks
That flesh is heir to, ’tis a consummation Devoutly to be wish’d.
(Hamlet, Act III, scene 1)

Referring to this very speech, George Santayana commented on “the positivism that underlies Shakespeare’s thinking.” Santayana found this attitude striking; “Shakespeare,” he wrote, “is remarkable among the greater poets for being without a philosophy and without a religion.”1

Hamlet’s stance toward the world, and Shakespeare’s approach to religion, become all the more powerful with the audience’s realization that the act being contemplated is that of self-destruction, or what we would now call suicide. (According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the word suicide dates from about 1651, almost half a century after Shakespeare wrote Hamlet.